You've probably heard that claim before.
But is there any truth or value in this when we talk about the relationship between members of the owner family who are at different levels in the family business's management hierarchy?
The answer must (unfortunately, some would say) be a categorical no!
In the short term, it may seem easier to act on your own initiative now and deal with the consequences later. But in the long run, this is an almost certain path to problems within the owner family.
Would you yourself trust someone who kept acting contrary to the decision-making powers that apply in the company?
And from the 'sinner's' perspective:
Do you fundamentally respect a person whose authority you do not always take into account when making a decision; a decision that you even execute right under that person's nose?
It can be frustrating to have to ask for permission. But if, for example, your nephew is above you in the formal hierarchy of the family business, you can't just ignore it because he's your 'annoying little nephew'.
Admission from here:
I know this because I once tried to be the one who broke the 'chain of command' in a family business. And I could think of reasons why it was absolutely necessary. But it was not – and never will be – a constructive way to exert influence.
If you really believe that your decisions are better than those of your superiors, you must handle it in the only right way:
The professional way.
With openness, respect, and acceptance in relation to formal decision-making powers.
Even in a family business.
