You've probably heard that claim before.
But is there any truth or value in it when it comes to the relationship between members of the owner family who are at different places in the family business management hierarchy?
The answer (unfortunately, some might say) is a categorical no!
In the short term, it might seem easier to act according to your own head now and deal with it later. But in the long run, it's an almost certain path to problems in the family of owners.
Because would you trust someone who continued to act against the decision-making authority of the company?
And from the perspective of the 'culprit':
Basically, do you respect a person whose authority you don't always take into account when making a decision; a decision that you even execute right under their nose?
Asking for permission can be frustrating. But if, for example, your nephew is above you in the formal hierarchy of the family business, you can't just ignore it because he's your 'annoying little nephew'.
Admission from here:
One of the reasons I know this is because I was once the one who broke the 'chain of command' in a family business. And I could think of reasons why it was almost imperative. But it was not - and never will be - a constructive way to exert your influence.
If you truly believe that your decisions are better than those of your superiors, you have to handle it the only right way:
The professional.
With openness, respect and acceptance of formal decision-making powers.
Even in a family business.
